<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shahar Solomianik &#187; cybersquatting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaharsol.com/tag/cybersquatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaharsol.com</link>
	<description>Since Twitter allows only 140 characters...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter Cybersquatting?</title>
		<link>http://shaharsol.com/2009/02/18/twitter-cybersquatting/</link>
		<comments>http://shaharsol.com/2009/02/18/twitter-cybersquatting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahar Solomianik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaharsol.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately, the revenue generating intentions of Twitter are becoming clearer. Twitter already understands that businesses see a great value in operating a twitter account, and they tend to search for their revenue there. It sounds like a great idea.
However, a phenomenom that has been quite negligible up until now has become significant: cybersquatting over twitter. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, the revenue generating intentions of Twitter are <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/16/twitter-hiring-product-manager-to-bring-in-the-revenue/">becoming</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-start-charging-companies-for-having-an-account/">clearer</a>. Twitter already understands that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/survey-says-twitter-is-better-than-facebook-for-businesses/">businesses see a great value</a> in operating a twitter account, and they tend to search for their revenue there. It sounds like a great idea.</p>
<p>However, a phenomenom that has been quite negligible up until now has become significant: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting">cybersquatting</a> over twitter. The value of having a branded Twitter account is so clear to businesses and Twitter alike; this value is also clear to opportunists who are squatting the twitter account names from big companies, probably with future monetization ideas in mind.</p>
<p>Try it for yourself, it&#8217;s fun! Just think of a big corporation and see if there is already a twitter account with its name. While some businesses seem to have been fast enough to secure their Twitter account (<a href="http://twitter.com/google">@google</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/facebook">@facebook</a>), some slower reacting corporations have been squatted already.  It&#8217;s hard to believe <a href="http://twitter.com/microsoft">@microsoft</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/apple">@apple</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/chevrolet">@chevrolet</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/audi">@audi</a> are really representatives from the corresponding companies.</p>
<p>I wonder when Twitter will start paying attention to this issue and how they intend to solve it. Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaharsol.com/2009/02/18/twitter-cybersquatting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->